Util the supports the weaken function
s/the/that/
On my i386 workstation, the XS version is installed

hasnt mad any difference ;-(

p_masho, yum clean all && yum update php

its doing something )) ta

p_masho, ok

However, on an x86_64 server it is not present

I filed a bug report (and fixed installonlyn) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=251771

zooted, thanks
zooted, how did you fix installonly?
zooted, what version of fedora are you using?

I told it to allow up to 5 kernels in /etc/yum/pluginconf.d/installonlyn.conf I am running F7 on a Powerbook G4 Titanium, as well as a p4 laptop and an Athlon/Geode based server (which will not boot the current kernel).

zooted, ok, cool

Hi, using fc6, I just upgraded my kernel and I can't seem to adjust my acpi trip points any more
I used to echo some values into /proc/acpi/ThermalZone/THRM/trip_points but now I get "invalid argument" when I try
is there some new way of doing this?
using 2.6.22.1-32.fc6, just fyi

Is there any way to change the Fedora kde menu to look like the suse kickoff menu ?

is there some reason why all the sudden I wouldn't be able to adjust these values?
bis there some reason why all the sudden I wouldn't be able to adjust these values?/b

daemoen, why the sigh?

everybody says xfce is faster then gnome, is this right? i mean for me gnome acts much faster

then for you gnome is faster

hello all

sup

with kimball giving claims back to Novell, and microsoft and novell having merged, its therein going to assist microsoft in the whole "linux is using 283 of our ip" crap

daemoen, stop worring about it

no one here cares

anyone know how much of an odeal it is to get nagios installed on FC? is it just a case of using yum and then setting up the hosts/hostgroups etc or has it got to be done from source?

don't give energy to what you don't want to see.. give energy to things you want to see prosper .. simple
yep

opsec, nice

yes from yum or yes from source?

yumk
oops
yum

lol
ta

source is never recommended in fedora
unless you're recompiling an srpm or making your own rpm

if i scroll in a firefox tab, it starts to lag, what could this cause?

b52, lack of memory
….possibly

is your finger getting tired and scrolling slower?

-.-

yeah ignore me im sleep deprived

b52, how much memory do you have?

the page is long or graphic intensive

512 mb

also possible

but i had no problem with the same page under windows

that's not much ram either though.

vid driver

what page is it?
no xxx links…

http://wiki.xfce.org/faq

sounds like your gfz driver

512 should be enough …

gfx

doesn't lag at all for me

but for me

radeon graphics driver, quad xeon 4gb ram

hi

the same page would have lagged under windows without the gfx driver
software rendering

Is there a way to have konqueror automatically start up when I login?

acceleration even

and how?

sure, are you using KDE?

gnome

look for session management in the preferences menu
someone who uses gnome can tell you where exactly

is there a package that includes acpidump?

statup tab

^^
*startup tab

ixion?

there's a package called acpidump
yeah ?

I couldn't yum it
I tried yum install acpidump

how can i set the mode to no software rendering?

this is strange.. where is there a list of the "latest fedora" packages, cant believe their on php5.04 ?

oops… was lookin on debian site.. getting confused between the two channels

they're

b52 install the relevant driver for your gfx card
no idea how… dont use gui

you mean they are ?

they're / they are .. same thing
their / there / they're .. not the same
php i386 5.2.2-3 fedora 1.3 M
latest php (non development)

?

this is the problem I having.. I tun "yum update" and nothing seems to happen ..

rpm -q php
what does that return?

= php-5.0.4-10.5

yum clean all && yum update php

opsec, already suggested that

i don't think that is a fedora package
uname -a

yum update = http://pastebin.mozilla.org/183179
4 CEST 2007 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64

see .. we can't help you with that

its a dedicated server - somewhere

you're not running a fedora kernel

what is it then ?

that is most likely *not* a fedora system
whatever homebrew your host came up with

it is a Fedora system

no, it isn't
you were lied to
many hosts do this, you're not alone
they take a distro and rape it so that it cannot be supported any longer

p_masho, locate release | grep etc

godaddy is infamous for this

opsec, think he said it was 1&1

its 1&1 http://order.1and1.co.uk/xml/order/ServerRoot;jsessionid=2356276E7015685F100C6A6C57F67031.TC32b?__frame=_top&__lf=Static

p_masho, `locate release | grep etc`

you don't want fedora on a remote dedicated server anyway even if it *was* authentic

its updatedb'ing atmo

p_masho, ok

i'd request centos or rhel

well the whole point fo getting this machine is that I need phpjson and php5.2

regardless of that

can anyone tell me what version nagios is on in yum ?

opsec, i suspect putting fedora on hosts is only serving to give it a bad rep

or where I should look ?

ixion, you don't have a fedora machine i take it?

it its defora ? http://pastebin.mozilla.org/183182

you mean putting homebrew versions of fedora?

no.. im busy deciding whether to go debian or fedora
apt has it at version 1.4 which is kinda old

p_masho, cat /etc/redhat-release

that kernel alone shows it isn't fedora

Fedora Core release 4 (Stentz)

opsec, just curious to what release it is pretending to be

haha
seriously out of luck
nagios-2.9-1.fc7

thanks

you have been ripped off

ixion, intended purpose?

you mean of nagios?

not only is that version of fedora been hacked up and raped .. it's EOL